Aave 风险管理器利用 Kelp DAO 漏洞对 2 个坏账场景进行建模
Burns Brief
第一种情况要便宜得多，但存在 rsETH 脱钩约 15% 的风险，而第二种情况成本较高，但可以更好地保护以太坊主网，并将损失集中在第 2 层。这一消息令市场参与者感到不安，空头希望压低价格，而多头则试图捍卫关键支撑位。观察 $ETH $AAVE 的反应 - 高于或低于关键水平的决定性走势将确认下一个趋势。
The first scenario is far cheaper but runs the risk of rsETH depegging an estimated 15%, while the second is costlier but better protects Ethereum mainnet and concentrates losses at the layer 2 level.
Key Takeaways
- The first scenario is far cheaper but runs the risk of rsETH depegging an estimated 15%, while the second is costlier but better protects Ethereum mainnet and concentrates losses at the layer 2 level