Les banques centrales du monde traitent désormais les pièces stables comme une véritable menace monétaire de plusieurs milliards de dollars.
Burns Brief
Les banques centrales du monde entier ont cessé depuis longtemps de se demander si les pièces stables sont risquées. La nouvelle a secoué les acteurs du marché, les baissiers cherchant à faire baisser les prix tandis que les haussiers tentent de défendre les niveaux de support clés. Surveillez la réaction de $ETH : un mouvement décisif au-dessus ou en dessous des niveaux clés confirmera la prochaine tendance.
The world's central banks stopped arguing about whether stablecoins are risky long ago. Their main concern now is about who will control them and how. On April 20, BIS General Manager Pablo Hernandez de Cos called for global cooperation on stablecoins, describing it as “critically important.” The Bank for International Settlements , often called the central bankers' central bank, has raised concerns about stablecoins before, but the language they've used is much sharper now. De Cos warned about runs that could trigger market stress, about dollar-pegged tokens accelerating the dollarization of developing economies, and about fragmented regulatory frameworks that private firms can arbitrage across borders. That's the language of systemic risk, distinct from the investor-protection framing that dominated earlier debates. A stablecoin is a cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value relative to a fiat currency. Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC are the two largest, together accounting for roughly 85% of the $315 billion in stablecoins currently in circulation. Unlike a savings account or legal tender, a stablecoin functions as a private IOU worth $1, backed by reserves that include US Treasury bills and built for speed across borders and crypto markets. At that scale, the convenience is exactly what central banks now find alarming. Central banks are worried about deposits, not pegs The concern over peg stability is real: if an issuer can't maintain the $1 value during heavy redemptions, the result is a run that forces rapid liquidation of reserve assets, injecting volatility into Treasury markets. The deeper concern, however, is what stablecoins do to the banking system as they grow. When people hold tokens instead of bank deposits, banks lose the funding base they use to make loans. When payments settle on private token networks rather than bank rails, banks lose fee income, transaction data, and customer relationships. The ECB has been explicit about this chain:
Key Takeaways
- The world's central banks stopped arguing about whether stablecoins are risky long ago
- Their main concern now is about who will control them and how
- On April 20, BIS General Manager Pablo Hernandez de Cos called for global cooperation on stablecoins, describing it as “critically important
- ” The Bank for International Settlements , often called the central bankers' central bank, has raised concerns about stablecoins before, but the language they've used is much sharper now
- That's the language of systemic risk, distinct from the investor-protection framing that dominated earlier debates