Die Verzögerung von CLARITY beim Testen der Stablecoin-Warnung der Wall Street in Höhe von 6,6 Billionen US-Dollar steht im Widerspruch zur Ansicht des Weißen Hauses
Burns Brief
Der CLARITY Act ist bei den Bankenberatungen des Senats ins Stocken geraten und hat eine Reihe von Marktregeln zurückgeworfen, die den größten Teil der Pro-Krypto-Haltung, die sich unter Präsident Donald durchgesetzt hatte, in Gesetzen festigen würden ... Die Nachricht hat die Marktteilnehmer verunsichert, wobei Bären versuchen, die Preise nach unten zu drücken, während Bullen versuchen, wichtige Unterstützungsniveaus zu verteidigen. Achten Sie auf die Bestätigung des Volumens – ein Ausbruch über das durchschnittliche Volumen würde signalisieren, dass sich der Trend wahrscheinlich fortsetzt.
The CLARITY Act has stalled in Senate Banking deliberations, setting back an array of market rules that would solidify into law most of the pro-crypto stance that took hold in the President Donald Trump administration. Yet, Congress may have handed crypto markets an unexpected experiment. Galaxy Research puts the odds of enactment this year at roughly 50-50, possibly lower, with unresolved disputes over DeFi provisions, jurisdiction, and stablecoin yield language. The bill spans token classification, exchange and broker-dealer registration, software carveouts, and DeFi provisions, with the rewards dispute representing one contested layer inside a much larger framework. On the rewards layer is where Wall Street's most concrete stablecoin-related fear lives, and a stall could let the market answer it before Congress does. The rewards lane The GENIUS Act explicitly bars stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield solely for holding a payment stablecoin, resolving the simplest version of the fight. The harder question is if exchanges and third parties can offer cash back, referral bonuses, or promotional yields without running into the same prohibition. Both the OCC's March proposal and the FDIC's April proposal extended anti-evasion presumptions to some affiliate and related third-party arrangements, narrowing the lane. Yet, both documents are still proposed rules pending finalization, and regulators are still defining the practical scope of what counts as prohibited. Banks have framed this open perimeter as an existential threat to their competitiveness. The ABA's community bank letter cited up to $6.6 trillion in deposits as potentially at risk, warning that exchange-funded inducements could pull savings out of the banking system. Standard Chartered put a more bounded forecast of up to $500 billion in deposit outflows to stablecoins by the end of 2028, with regional banks carrying the most exposure. The argument centers on exchange-funded rewards that make stabl
Key Takeaways
- Yet, Congress may have handed crypto markets an unexpected experiment
- Galaxy Research puts the odds of enactment this year at roughly 50-50, possibly lower, with unresolved disputes over DeFi provisions, jurisdiction, and stablecoin yield language
- On the rewards layer is where Wall Street's most concrete stablecoin-related fear lives, and a stall could let the market answer it before Congress does
- The rewards lane The GENIUS Act explicitly bars stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield solely for holding a payment stablecoin, resolving the simplest version of the fight
- The harder question is if exchanges and third parties can offer cash back, referral bonuses, or promotional yields without running into the same prohibition